IPCC find the average of uncorroborated climate models useful!

The average value of an ensemble of climate models is often used as an argument in the debate. What does it mean? The following is a quote from the contribution from Working group I to the fifth assessment report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.:

Box 12.1 | Methods to Quantify Model Agreement in Maps
“The climate change projections in this report are based on ensembles of climate models. The ensemble mean is a useful quantity to characterize the average response to external forcings, but does not convey any information on the robustness of this response across models, its uncertainty and/or likelihood or its magnitude relative to unforced climate variability.”

This can be regarded as a glimpse of realism. Except from the logical fallacy expressed in the same section. Let us rephrase the section:

The ensemble mean does not convey any information on:
– the robustness of this response across models
– its uncertainty
– likelihood
– its magnitude relative to unforced climate variability
but it is a useful quantity to characterize the average response to external forcing.

That is a quite silly thing to say – isn´t it?

How can it be useful when you do not know
– if it is robust
– its uncertainty
– its likelihood
– its magnitude relative to unforced climate variability?

Exactly what is the ensemble mean then supposed to be useful for?

Later in the same section it is stated:

“There is some debate in the literature on how the multi-model ensembles should be interpreted statistically. This and past IPCC reports treat the model spread as some measure of uncertainty, irrespective of the number of models, which implies an ‘indistinguishable’ interpretation.”

I think this section speaks for it self. What ” implies an indistinguishable interpretation” is supposed to mean – I have no idea – I don’t even find it worth analyzing the argument. If you have read this far – I think you agree with me that it is totally meaningless.

The panel should have concluded that the models are not reliable. The models have not fulfilled the requirements for an quantitative theoretical model to be regarded as reliable. See: What does it take for an quantitative theoretical model to be reliable?

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “IPCC find the average of uncorroborated climate models useful!

  1. Pingback: Index – Posts by “Science or Fiction” | Science or fiction?

  2. It is not my first time to visit this website, i am browsing this web site dailly
    and take nice facts from here every day.

    Like

    • Thanks a lot for that feed-back. 🙂
      I´m very sorry for my late reply, by some incomprehensible reason your comment ended up in the spam filter.
      Anyhow, you should now be able to make any comments you like.
      Welcome back.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s